On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi! Jon Ciesla, first time caller, long time listener.
Fedora packager since rawhide was Fedora 7. Linux user and game player
since RedHat 7.1. I'm on FPC, and maintain a pile of stuff, including lots
of games/
Useful links:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/limb/
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Limb
I can package, review, offer advice, etc. I have 2 kids so I'm highly
motivated to keep several games working and find new ones. :)
Peace,
-me
--
http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/
------------------------------------------------
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
_______________________________________________
games mailing list
games(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/games@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi!
I see you are the maintainer of Battle for Wesnoth (among lots of other
things); first off, as someone who's played Wesnoth over the years using
your packages, thanks for maintaining this game!
Do you think it would be feasible for us to provide a wesnoth-devel (maybe
"wesnoth-unstable" would be a better name) package tracking the
odd-numbered unstable/development release series? (For those on-list not
familiar with upstream's development cycle, Wesnoth upstream maintains two
parallel branches simultaneously; a stable branch, which is always
even-numbered, and a development branch, which is always odd-numbered. So,
for example, we're currently on 1.12 and 1.13).
It'd be nice if it was possible for both packages to coexist on the same
system: the main advantage I see from providing a wesnoth-unstable is that
it lets people (be they users reporting bugs or developers working on addon
content) easily test against the latest development release in addition to
the latest stable release.
Ben Rosser