>
>>
>> On Wed, 2007-08-08 at 10:00 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>
>>> After a bit of funging, I've got a spec and a few patches which conform
>>> to
>>> the above. I contacted upstream about the name, and got no response.
>>> The
>>> name I'm currently working under is WeaselCycles.
>>>
>>> Anyone want to see it, and/or offer suggestions before I submit it for
>>> review?
>>
>> The code change looks ok on a first pass, you need to do the docs as
>> well.
>
> If you look at the html docs included in the RPM, you'll see that they are
> affected by the change in the configure file.
>
>> Also, the spec file from upstream makes me cry. Please rewrite it. :)
>
> I know, I could hear the kittens screaming when I read it. I intend to,
> once the name is sorted out. :)
When I mentioned that I'd altered the logo, there were eager suggestions
from upstream to provide us with a version of the logo reflecting the name
change. Is it ok to include the project's URL,
http://www.armagetronad.net, in the logo? It's not a deal-breaker if it's
not.
I'm going to say its OK, as we're not calling the software the URL.
~spot