Nicu Buculei wrote:
Nicu Buculei wrote:
> It also look like using software rendering instead of OpenGL (I
> understood from an earlier message it was supposed to use exclusively
> OpenGL)
OK, I figured this: that was the case for 2.4.1-1, the latest is 2.4.1-2
which install two binaries, one with OpenGL and another with software
rendering and the menu points to the software version.
How about changing the launcher to point to the OpenGL version and leave
the other as a safe backup option available from the command line?
I think that software rendering is the safer default, or maybe even
better a wrapper script which detects _true_ opengl support (using
glxinfo?) and then chooses.
Regards,
Hans