On Sun, 2005-05-08 at 19:13 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Sat, 2005-05-07 at 13:46 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Uttered Karsten Wade <kwade(a)redhat.com>, spake thus:
>
> > Ah, I see. I'd say that we do have CVS history worth saving, presuming
> > that it's still there from before the move.
> >
> > How about we do all new documents as new modules, and when Elliott is
> > available, we can have him do the change. I'd guess that shell access
> > on cvs.fedora is hard to come by.
>
> I'd think that too. In that case, Elliott can do the whole shebang in
> about three minutes, while Paul and I watch over his shoulder and
> joggle his elbow.
Here's a patch that I guess will work for now. Karsten, you have commit
perms for CVSROOT/ so you will need to put this one up. I don't think
we'll need shell access for anything. If we can get Elliot to simply
put us in the CVSROOT/avail file as having rights to write to
CVSROOT/modules (and really we only need that file, I think), we can add
modules when needed.
I thought Tommy was saying that we _couldn't_ just write the new modules
file this way because we'd lose CVS history for those modules. Or is
this patch in preparation for Elliott doing cvs-fu? We can actually
find someone else to do that cvs-fu, instead of panting on Elliott's
doorstep for his return. Otherwise, I'll apply the patch.
Thanks for doing this!
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer *
http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/