[Bug 627417] New: docs.fp.o landing page needs 'Start here' note!
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: docs.fp.o landing page needs 'Start here' note!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=627417
Summary: docs.fp.o landing page needs 'Start here' note!
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: docs-requests
AssignedTo: eric(a)christensenplace.us
ReportedBy: nathan.thomas(a)peacenik.co.uk
QAContact: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, kwade(a)redhat.com,
nb(a)fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
We have a large variety of documentation guides serving a wide range of
different users. It may be difficult for users arriving at docs.fp.o to know
where to start, especially if they are new to Fedora/Linux and are unfamiliar
with some of the technical terms.
A note on the landing page suggesting a sensible starting point for new users
could help alleviate this problem. Eg:
"New to Fedora? You can try Fedora on your PC without touching your existing
installation by following the Live Image Guide."
The end of the Live Image guide helpfully points users to the Installation
guide if they want to install :)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
8 years, 8 months
[Bug 654484] New: New Bugzilla component for Storage Administration Guide
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: New Bugzilla component for Storage Administration Guide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654484
Summary: New Bugzilla component for Storage Administration
Guide
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: docs-requests
AssignedTo: eric(a)christensenplace.us
ReportedBy: r.landmann(a)redhat.com
QAContact: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, kwade(a)redhat.com,
nb(a)fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Please create a component for the Storage Administration Guide; default
assignee should be ddomingo(a)redhat.com
Cheers
Rudi
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
8 years, 9 months
[Bug 450331] New: lack of documentation on restoring from bare-metal (UUID problem)
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450331
Summary: lack of documentation on restoring from bare-metal (UUID
problem)
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: docs-requests
AssignedTo: kwade(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: czar(a)acm.org
QAContact: stickster(a)gmail.com
CC: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449299
There is a lack of documentation on restoring a system from bare metal. I have
found (see reference) that restore the root ("/") is not as simple as as just
executing the restore command when running in rescue mode.
With the current emphasis being place on use of UUIDs in both Fedora and RHEL,
the whole business of UUIDs need to be better documented.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora 9
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
10 years, 5 months
[Bug 595695] New: Direct links to RNs broken.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Direct links to RNs broken.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=595695
Summary: Direct links to RNs broken.
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: docs-requests
AssignedTo: eric(a)christensenplace.us
ReportedBy: eric(a)christensenplace.us
QAContact: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, kwade(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
* Previously, the release notes were located at
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/
* Their location has changed to release specific URLs.
* A link to the release notes is provided in fedora-bookmarks.
* fedora-bookmarks are imported by the browser only on *first launch* so as to
not overwrite user modifications.
The new bookmarks layout causes two problems:
1. Nobody filed a fedora-bookmarks bug so Fedora 13 (and anyone on F-11 or F-12
etc) will default to going to http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/
which is a 404. Since the bookmarks can only be imported on first launch, we
cannot push an update to fix this if the user has launched the browser (which
is extremely likely).
2. Even if I were to fix the bookmarks page to point directly to a specific
release version (which again would take effect only if someone would yum update
before launching Firefox), then if anyone updated to F-14, the bookmark would
not change and would still point to e.g. F-13.
So, I do not think that we should put version specific information into our
bookmarks URLs. To solve both of the above problems, I believe we should try to
do some User-Agent detection and redirection. Fedora browsers have an RPM NVR
attached to them.
For example:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; es-ES; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100517
Fedora/3.6.4-1.fc13 Firefox/3.6.4
This tells us that the user's installed language is es-ES and it's a Fedora
browser, specifically running F-13. We should then redirect queries to
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/ to
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/es-ES/Fedora/13/html/Release_Notes/index.html
If we cannot figure any information out about the Fedora release or language
(or there are no relnotes in that language), I propose the default redirect
should be to the en-US version of the latest Fedora release notes.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
11 years
[Bug 693635] New: Intel Mac and Live USB
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Intel Mac and Live USB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693635
Summary: Intel Mac and Live USB
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: x86_64
OS/Version: Mac OS
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: unspecified
Component: docs-requests
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: earthwormgaz(a)googlemail.com
QAContact: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
CC: stickster(a)gmail.com, kwade(a)redhat.com,
nb(a)fedoraproject.org, eric(a)christensenplace.us,
oglesbyzm(a)gmail.com
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Description of problem:
Hi,
I just spent a couple of days trying to put the F15 Alpha Live CD image onto a
USB stick for use with my Macbook Pro.
It turns out this isn't possible.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_USB#Limitations
I think this ought to go on the documentation somewhere, just to save people
time.
In my case, my CD drive is dead, so I can't install Fedora.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.
12 years
[Bug 504066] New: CMS for docs.fp.org
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: CMS for docs.fp.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504066
Summary: CMS for docs.fp.org
Product: Fedora Documentation
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: project-tracking
AssignedTo: kwade(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: mel(a)redhat.com
QAContact: kwade(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Zikula chosen, working on test instances and project plan with Zikula team
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 years, 3 months
[danishka@gmail.com: Re: [Fedora-spins] 640MB memory for remix]
by Paul W. Frields
>From the Spins list. I know Adam Williamson recently reopened the
following bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499585
Could someone check the current git content and make sure we capture
this change in 'master' and any further update on the F15 branch?
Paul
----- Forwarded message from Danishka Navin <danishka(a)gmail.com> -----
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 12:50:55 +0530
From: Danishka Navin <danishka(a)gmail.com>
To: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to>
Cc: The Spin Special Interest Group mailing list <spins(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>, Rahul Sundharam
<rahulsundaram(a)gmail.com>, "Paul W. Frields" <pfrields(a)fedoraproject.org>
Subject: Re: [Fedora-spins] 640MB memory for remix
As per our web site minimum memory requirement is 768 MB.
I think we must revert the release notes.
Download Requirements
- 400 MHz Pentium Pro or better processor (comparable AMD, Cyrix, and VIA
processors also acceptable)
- At least 768 MB memory (RAM), 1 GB recommended for best performance
- 10 GB disk space / storage
But acording to the release notes.....
- Recommended for text-mode: 200 MHz Pentium Pro or better
- Recommended for graphical: 400 MHz Pentium Pro or better
- Minimum RAM for text-mode: 256 MiB
- Minimum RAM for graphical: 384 MiB
- Recommended RAM for graphical: 512 MiB
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora/15/html/Release_Notes/sect-Rel...
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Bruno Wolff III <bruno(a)wolff.to> wrote:
> On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 19:09:00 +0530,
> Danishka Navin <danishka(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just installed a Fedora 15 based remix and it asking for 640MB of
> memory
> > for i386 release.
> > but this was not appear when I build the same when F15 beta was
> available.
>
> The memory requirement should drop for F16.
>
> > Btw, There is no "Install to Hard Disk" icon in the Desktop.
>
> I believe it should show up in favorites if you are using gnome.
> For other desktops you may need to do some work to get one for your remix.
>
--
Danishka Navin
http://danishkanavin.blogspot.com
http://twitter.com/danishkanavin
http://identi.ca/danishka
----- End forwarded message -----
12 years, 4 months
RE: docs Digest, Vol 87, Issue 18
by yagami raito
Hi ,,
Thanks for the quick answer . I got it now
But please help . I have another big problem :( when I boot with the live CD that I mad , It works just the problem is the contrast is very very very low . I barly can see those unity icons and I even can´t see the mouvement of the mouse .. which means its just dark*dark
the same problem happened to me with another distro " Mageia RC " I installed it and when I amorce it its just black again ;(
Please dont tell me there is no solution for this problem . I really liked this new Fedora with Gnome3 and I wanna work on it
Thanks for help :)
12 years, 4 months