On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 21:53 +0000, Stuart Ellis wrote:
I think that different types of content require different
arrangements,
and the same considerations probably apply whatever the technology (Wiki
or static pages).
Pages with certain kinds of content need to be carefully maintained, and
may need more stringent change control than is usual. Material like:
- Legal and policy statements
- Project admin, e.g. schedules
- Download pages (with URLs and checksums)
- "Shop-front" pages, like the front page and FAQ, intended to be seen
by the new and unwary
For other stuff, it may be best to let people get on and produce
whatever they need. Having one person per category to act as a
maintainer, moderator and point of contact is probably enough.
This sounds like a reasonable compromise of control, applying more where
it is needed, less where it gets in the way.
FWIW, I really like Patrick's idea of having of a mailing list
for
official and third-party Website maintainers to get together.
I have request fedora-websites-list and will announce it here when it is
ready. A post to fedora-announce also seems in order.
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer *
http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/