while persistence is something i understand, i as a nonnativenglishspeaker,
don't really understand that overlay persistence. so yes, imho it should be
replaced.
2008/5/19 Rahul Sundaram <sundaram(a)fedoraproject.org>:
Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
> I'm not sure whether changing this midstream is a great idea. After
> all, the "persistence" and "persistent overlay" were terms I
described
> repeatedly and consistently with every one of the dozen or more
> interviews I gave for Fedora 9.
>
I noticed and it I am still not sure it is the right choice. Many people
didn't even get the idea on what was different from previous releases of
Fedora or other distributions on this particular USB feature. I am still of
the opinion "persistent overlay" is just not the right terminology for end
users.
Rahul
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
--
Linux counter #213090