On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 07:14 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 10:35 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
> Perhaps we should shoot for 1700 UTC since that is the other block that
> looks most open on our draft schedule:
>
>
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BobJensen/MeetingTimes
OK. I put time my times before the time change, so I'll have to review
that the chart is still accurate for me.
In general 1700 is a little late in the morning for me, but I'll make do
today.
Should we adjust the chart to the new DST? I suppose that could be as
easy as rearranging the left-most "time" cells and scooting one row to
the other end of the table. If so, all my times will apply again (i.e.
before 5:00 p.m. is always bad for me whether that's UTC-5 or UTC-4),
and I guess everyone else is about the same. But since DST moves
differently for many places, I didn't want to be too presumptuous by
scootching the entries around like that.
/me hates DST and wishes it could just evaporate, or that we would base
all time on British standard/summer time instead.
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Project:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PaulWFrields
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug