On Wednesday 05 July 2006 14:55, Karsten Wade <kwade(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Sun, 2006-07-02 at 22:51 -0500, Patrick W. Barnes wrote:
> I don't see any reason we couldn't use UTF-8 for the HTML documents, and
> I would support making that change.
IIRC, the issue we had in the past was that we were building UTF-8 but
httpd on
fedora.redhat.com was serving it as the (default) ISO-8859-1.
This caused "funny characters" to appear only on pages built from our
DocBook outputted HTML wrapped with the PHP includes.
Is this not the case now? Or am I totally on the wrong path?
If we can't provide UTF-8, I'd call that a bug. If we decide to push UTF-8,
then the Infrastructure team can make sure that the websites can support it.
We can try switching to UTF-8 and take any issues that arise to
Infrastructure for correction.
--
Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes
nman64(a)n-man.com
http://www.n-man.com/
LinkedIn:
http://www.linkedin.com/in/nman64
Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance!
http://rate.affero.net/nman64/
--