On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 06:07, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 21:34, Karsten Wade wrote:
> * We don't want outside repositories or hosted draft
documents to be
> seen _at_all_ as official, supported, backed-up, unrootkitted, or
> anything sources for FDP docs or SCM (software configuration
^^^^^ other than? (not nitpicking, just making sure I
understand.)
> management).
Bad idiomatic usage ... it should parse like, "we don't want outside
repositories to be seen at all as official anything to do with FDP."
Still awkward. How about:
* Because of concerns over support, availability, redundancy, and
security, we don't want non-FDP doc or source repositories to be seen as
"officially" connected to the project. For example, if someone's SCM
gets compromised and a rootkit trojan is loaded into document tarball
... well, bad things could happen.
Hope that is clearer,
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE, Tech Writer
a lemon is just a melon in disguise
http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41