-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 02/16/2011 09:43 AM, Zach Oglesby wrote:
Over the last few days it has been decided that we are going to move
all of Fedora's translation efforts away from a self hosted solution
and on to
transifex.net.
The migration over to
tx.net also means a huge jump to version 1.1
from 0.7, with that we no longer have support for tx to commit to the
git repo[1]. This is going to require a redesign of our workflow to
insure that we are publishing the most up to date.
The new system requires us to use a command-line tool, that is in the
process of being packaged, and works much like git[1]. This means that
we now have to pull in translations by hand, but
tx.net can monitor
the git repo (over HTTP) for changes that we make (you can also push
via tx command).
Trans.fp.o will be turned off on Feb 18th, so we need to make sure
that we have all of the current trans worked saved and then we need to
work on moving to
tx.net. We still have a little time to get that part
of this figured out since we are not due to make POT files until March
15th, but we need to start looking at what this means for publishing
to docs.fp.o and for packaging into the release.
It is important to remember that the pains that we may be dealing with
are not because of the migration to
tx.net but because of the upgrade
to 1.1, which would have happend regardless. If anyone has any
questions or concerns please don't hesitate to ask!
I am going to add this to the agenda for tonights meeting as well.
[1]:
http://help.transifex.net/user-guide/one-dot-zero.html
[2]:
http://help.transifex.net/user-guide/client/client-0.4.html
This sounds like a great opportunity for the translators to better own
their translations. I know at one point we were looking at translators
being responsible for publishing and packaging their translations when
they felt their translations were ready. This would solve the problem
of us Docs folks arbitrarily publishing translations.
It is unfortunate that
tx.net can't interface with our git repositories,
though. I'd hate to loose data in a system we don't have control over.
- --Eric
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iF4EAREIAAYFAk1b7cQACgkQU03aaJDMNEU0mQD/aW4KaxeepGeNEop85kwtV/hs
WR1vB07iXVJ37cJmUkoBAI33VY+OyZsC1A7fb13Zf+0HMTNmW+pqGHM3b1Wz47yo
=4v3s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----