On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 19:01 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
The current policy is clear that there's a one-week delay, then
we have
the election and simply confirm the existing nominations to start with
if we're at fewer than the number of seats open. Of course, that policy
reads "proposal" at the top, so that makes it a little... er, less
clear.
I therefore make a counterproposal: We reschedule for nominations
closing on the 13th, elections starting on the 16th (2359 UTC all
dates). This gives us time to address this at a FDSCo meeting tonight
if possible, or at worst, here on the list, which is understandably a
little quiet since we all wore ourselves out at FUDCon.
I'll also suggest at the meeting that we discuss the proposal, which
didn't get a lot of uptake here on the list. Join us at #fedora-docs if
you're able.
Since no meeting, I also wanted to suggest that we clarify term limits.
The proposal says indefinite term, but that's not kosher IMHO. I
thought we agreed on staggering terms, but I need to check my old IRC
logs from FDSCo meetings to see what exactly was decided. I'm pretty
sure it didn't take into account, though, bypassing the vote taking and
simply placing nominees in FDSCo seats (as would happen in the event of
numCandidates < numSeats).
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Project Board:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board
Fedora Docs Project:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject