On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 12:53 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 14:16 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
> I had suggested this to Scott also in IRC. I think the process might
> work better (and be less exhausting for Scott!) if we use the Wiki page
> as a place simply to outline and make terse notes. Then Stuart and I
> can do the actual "longhand" writing in CVS, and Scott can view the
> results at the webtest host to monitor and critique our progress. This
> also keeps Scott from having to learn much about our style guidelines
> and cuts down on our workload too, since it's easier (I think) for us to
> write straight into CVS rather than convert -> merge (yuck) -> edit for
> style. Just my thoughts, waiting for others to comment...
+1
Whatever works for you three, but that seems elegant to me.
14 January is the freeze date for content that relates to FC5 test2. If
you want to do a coincidental test release of the Installation Guide, we
can surely get a link in the test2 announcement.
- Karsten
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
Lets shoot for FC5 test3, I need to learn how to edit in XML and get the
data I have already put into the correct format. Also I will need some
more time to run through the other installation methods with rawhide and
capture the remaining screen shots that I do not currently have. Based
on that I do not believe it is currently feasible to have a working
document by 14 January so test3 would be much more realistic.
--
Scott Glaser
Fedora Core User
Web -
http://fedoraunity.org/
Key fingerprint = 61F5 C7DF 2F63 4A53 44D2 B9BE 3841 EA4F 5990 00BD