On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 09:56 -0600, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster(a)gmail.com>,
spake thus:
> Although that means revision histories will be written differently
> than they are now, that's not a problem. DocBook doesn't mandate
> an order for them, so any way we want to do them is acceptable.
Well, we can output the changelog in any order we choose. Instead of
an <xsl:for-each> construct, something along the lines of
"blah/blah/revision[count()-position()]" could reverse the order.
I figured that nicety could wait.
Yeah, I'm starting to realize the more reading I do that XSLT is pretty
danged powerful. And yes, I am in fact late to the party, as usual. ;-D
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Documentation Project:
http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/