On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 11:41 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>Paul W. Frields wrote:
>>>If we are going to make any such change, we should probably make it
>>>globally. Having only one document use this convention adds needless
>>>complexity to our processes. I'm not opposed to doing this, but it
>>>needs to be a global decision either way.
>>>
>>Right. Might create all those languages under
>>release-notes/languages/<international language code> globally.
>
>Wouldn't it be easier to just use release-notes/<i18n-code>? Is there
>another factorization for the content, other than by language?
>
Well if we get translation for a large number of languages which is what
I am expecting to happen soon, then its easier to manage if those sub
directories are under languages instead of the root name space.
Currently the only factor for categorization is language but we might
have other factors later.
As long as there's a way to share common files like figures under a
common/ subdirectory we should be OK. I'm sure Tommy will think about
this and propose something logical.
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Documentation Project:
http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/