On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 10:48 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 10:04 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-05-05 at 16:45 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> > Karsten: Assign task of making docs use common files in ./ instead of
> > ../, in order to work for separate modules per document.
>
> I can see the benefits of going both paths (centralized vs decentralized
> configs). Is there a lot of demand for local xsl customization in the
> fedora-docs/* documents?
Actually, I don't think there would be that much demand, because it
would be a hindrance to consistency. Karsten, there should be a pretty
easy way to get modules to automatically "include" a checkout of the
common stuff.
Yes. What the above task refers to is re-writing the parent XML files
to reference ./common instead of ../common, etc. Same for the Makefile.
The task is predicated on the idea that we are going to have certain
directories included as part of a common checkout, within the body of
the module itself.
Another way is to have a massive common module that must be checked out
and available at ../. I think I prefer to have it all within ./ and
just fix the few docs we have.
Does this make sense?
thx - Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer *
http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/