On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 10:50 +0300, John Babich wrote:
On 6/8/07, Jonathan Roberts
<jonathan.roberts.uk(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 07/06/07, Karsten Wade <kwade(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 09:33 +0100, Jonathan Roberts wrote:
> > > Hey,
> > >
> > > I don't know but I'm guessing this was prompted by the Revisor
doc?
> >
> >
<snip>
You may already know this, but I had occasion to chat recently with daMaestro
of Fedora Unity, who also is a contributor to the Fedora Project.
See
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/JohnBabich/RevisorChat for details.
Basically, all docs on both the
fedoraproject.org and
fedoraunity.org sites
are under the Open Publication License (OPL), so that there's no problem
freely borrowing material from
revisor.fedoraunity.org.
+1
Our friends in Fedora Unity did that on purpose. :)
If there is enough content that you wonder if you have to fork it, let's
get together with the Revisor folks and work out where they want their
canonical documentation to live, and can we contribute to the SRPM with
content for /usr/share/doc/revisor-*.
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project
Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. |
fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\