Hello!
Assuming they are both OK with and there are no objections, I'll add
> them on 25 April.
>
I'm ok with that.
I failed to clarify that the FAS group really just conveys merge rights.
Do people think we need an "interested parties" FAS and a separate
"mergers FAS". This would really mean cleaning up at least one more of
the at least 3 docs FAS groups that exist :D
IMHO more FAS groups doesn't help much.
--
Eduard Lucena
Móvil: +56962318010
GNU/Linux User #589060
Ubuntu User #8749
Fedora Marketing Representative