On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 10:43 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 09:32 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
> Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster(a)gmail.com>, spake thus:
>
> > I made a few changes to the Makefile.common, and I think that should
> > work now. The example-tutorial/Makefile has been updated as well.
>
> For "nochunks", where do the graphics and images go?
Whoops. Well, originally I was thinking to myself, "Self, maybe you
should just leave that stuff out since it makes for, uh, more than one
file." Then I thought better of it... now the images and CSS come into
the current directory where they're expected. I don't see a big value
in a "nochunks-tarball," but if you disagree there's no reason we
couldn't have that target.
By the way, the XSL has been fixed to embed the legalnotice in the
nochunks version rather than creating an outboard file. While someone
shipping a document without images or CSS doesn't "break" the document
per se, if it goes without the legalnotice intact, that could be
considered an actual problem.
--
Paul W. Frields, RHCE
http://paul.frields.org/
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Fedora Documentation Project:
http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/