Anderson Silva wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I forgot to add the cli_report.py to the patch yesterday, here is an
updated version. My bad.
AS
Anderson Silva wrote:
> This is my first patch, and I had limited resources for testing.
>
> Consider this a 'working in progress'
>
> Feel free to submit feedback. One thing I still would like to do is:
>
> cobbler report --what=system --list-all-fields
>
> Which would provide a list of all available fields to anyone who would
> like use customize the report with the --fields options.
>
> AS
>
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cobbler mailing list
cobbler(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFItAFYECmX3C4JWKgRAjnRAKDDT5YLKNPhF7AJSVEO7NporxpsjwCgvY0M
vNb/5Jmoj5MSMQc6YO/zYuc=
=Hd8N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cobbler mailing list
cobbler(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
Ok, as I'm now cleared up with having 1.2 released, it's time to look
into applying this -- Currently this doesn't apply to devel head, as I'm
getting a few rejections (cli_report.py, cli_misc.py). I tried
applying manually by removing ReportFunction from cli_misc manually and
copying your code into api.py, but upon doing that, simple commands like
"cobbler report --what=distros" just printed "None", and I did not dig
further.
If you are starting from a clone of the latest devel, how should I be
applying these? Just patch 2? Or 1 then 2? Either way, I'm getting
rejects in both cases, so perhaps you want to try rebasing? Or is there
a github repo I can pull from?
Also I would expect that cli_distro and similar files that have a
reporting function are modified to reference the new reports? This
seems like it would involve some changes to command.py
Anyhow, let me know if you can sort out the above, and if not, I can dig
further and see what I can do. I'm sure it can be sorted out though if
it's trivially solved with a rebase operation and then it all works that
is easier than trying to apply it the hard way.
Thanks!
--Michael