On May 6, 2014, 9:16 a.m., Peter Schiffer wrote:
> Perhaps you forgot to rebase before submitting the review?
I didn't but whole software-dbus provider needs to be ported to use the new common
library, so I didn't want to do it partially in this patch. I'll fix those in
following patch.
- Peter
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-openlmi.rhcloud.com/r/1667/#review2574
-----------------------------------------------------------
On May 5, 2014, 5:27 p.m., Peter Schiffer wrote:
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard-openlmi.rhcloud.com/r/1667/
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated May 5, 2014, 5:27 p.m.)
Review request for OpenLMI Developers.
Repository: openlmi-providers
Description
-------
Software-dbus: implemented LMI_ResourceForSoftwareIdentityProvider
Diffs
-----
src/software-dbus/LMI_ResourceForSoftwareIdentityProvider.c
9332f62e392103e39a700cedcfaadf72df8e5f53
src/software-dbus/LMI_SoftwareIdentityProvider.c
7e03badf0113ebc981a24d20ccac60131dfb8d74
src/software-dbus/LMI_SoftwareIdentityResourceProvider.c
fec2794131a6194510364e45969995729e80108c
src/software-dbus/sw-utils.h 16e6ca11e4714ab337c7e554f7c8ced5b06bd37b
src/software-dbus/sw-utils.c 76ca58bd0129c3d12695d22da77fb3613c8685b1
Diff:
http://reviewboard-openlmi.rhcloud.com/r/1667/diff/
Testing
-------
Thanks,
Peter Schiffer