On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 08:14:58AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-10-14 at 18:17 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 02:45:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > Hey, folks. Requesting a freeze break for this PR (as it applies to
> > > comps-f31.xml.in):
> > >
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/427
> > >
> > > In F31 'dnf-yum' is no more and 'yum' obsoletes it, but
this was not
> > > changed in comps. As a result, clean installs of F31 (and Rawhide) have
> > > no 'yum' command, as we clearly intend they should.
> > >
> > > This isn't likely to make any images go oversize as all the
> > > package contains is a symlink linking /usr/bin/yum to /usr/bin/dnf-3
> > > and a manpage; /usr/bin/dnf-3 is part of python3-dnf which would
> > > already be in all the images.
> > I'm not sure if this is really an infrastructure thing to decide, but
> > for FWIW, +1. :)
> I thought I needed an FBR to poke comps at this point? I mean if
comps is in it's own 'fedora-comps' repo controlled by releng and is
more 'data' than anything to infrastructure.
> everyone wants some extra bureaucracy I can file a bug, propose it as
> FE, we can vote to accept the bug as an FE, then we can vote on an FBR
> to honor the FE...oh boy, I'm getting excited already!
Yeah, I don't know if it's worth all that.
How about we get the usual suspects to just vote in the PR?
How about we just merge it and go to lunch? :P
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net