On Tue, 2019-10-15 at 09:47 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 08:14:58AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Mon, 2019-10-14 at 18:17 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 02:45:49PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > > Hey, folks. Requesting a freeze break for this PR (as it applies to
> > > > comps-f31.xml.in):
> > > >
> > > > https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/427
> > > >
> > > > In F31 'dnf-yum' is no more and 'yum' obsoletes it,
but this was not
> > > > changed in comps. As a result, clean installs of F31 (and Rawhide)
> > > > no 'yum' command, as we clearly intend they should.
> > > >
> > > > This isn't likely to make any images go oversize as all the
> > > > package contains is a symlink linking /usr/bin/yum to /usr/bin/dnf-3
> > > > and a manpage; /usr/bin/dnf-3 is part of python3-dnf which would
> > > > already be in all the images.
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if this is really an infrastructure thing to decide, but
> > > for FWIW, +1. :)
> > I thought I needed an FBR to poke comps at this point? I mean if
> comps is in it's own 'fedora-comps' repo controlled by releng and is
> more 'data' than anything to infrastructure.
> > everyone wants some extra bureaucracy I can file a bug, propose it as
> > FE, we can vote to accept the bug as an FE, then we can vote on an FBR
> > to honor the FE...oh boy, I'm getting excited already!
> Yeah, I don't know if it's worth all that.
> How about we get the usual suspects to just vote in the PR?
How about we just merge it and go to lunch? :P
Works for me. ;)