infrastructure February 2011

infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

31 participants
32 discussions

RE: BFO config problem causes annoying "retry" messages (with easy fix)
by Matt Domsch 28 Feb '11

28 Feb '11

Is this worth changing during freeze? I'd think so... +1 from me. -- Matt Domsch Technology Strategist Dell | Office of the CTO -----Original Message----- From: Will Woods [mailto:wwoods@redhat.com] Sent: Sunday, February 27, 2011 4:49 PM To: admin(a)fedoraproject.org Subject: BFO config problem causes annoying "retry" messages (with easy fix) Hi guys, As detailed in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656076 the pxelinux config used by boot.fedoraproject.org causes annoying repeated "retry" messages during BFO installs. The problem is that bfo/pxelinux.cfg/fedora_install.conf specifies 'method=http://download.fedoraproject.org/...' as a boot argument. This overrides the yum repo files that are used in the installer in Fedora 13 and later - so we don't get to use the normal mirrorlists. The fix is really easy. Just change bfo/pxelinux.cfg/fedora_install.conf as follows: For Fedora 13 and 14, change: append method=http://[...]/os/ to: append stage2=http://[...]/os/images/install.img When you add Fedora 15 Alpha (or later), leave off the "append method" line altogether. (Fedora 15 has stage2 already inside the initrd.) This won't work for Fedora 12, but oh well. Hope this helps. Please contact me if you need any more info. -w

3 3

Fwd: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
by Stephen John Smoogen 28 Feb '11

28 Feb '11

Anyone know why asterisk1 is sending out emails? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON(a)fedoraproject.org> Date: Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 21:16 Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender To: asterisk(a)fedoraproject.org This is the mail system at host asterisk1.fedoraproject.org. I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below. For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster. If you do so, please include this problem report. You can delete your own text from the attached returned message. The mail system <mk101mx(a)fedoraproject.org>: host bastion[192.168.0.1] said: 550 5.1.1 <mk101mx(a)fedoraproject.org>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table (in reply to RCPT TO command) Final-Recipient: rfc822; mk101mx(a)fedoraproject.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;mk101mx(a)fedoraproject.org Action: failed Status: 5.1.1 Remote-MTA: dns; bastion Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 5.1.1 <mk101mx(a)fedoraproject.org>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table -- Stephen J Smoogen. "The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance." Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. "Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle." -- Ian MacLaren

4 4

Meeting Tomorrow 2011-02-24 2000 UTC -- *NEW CHANNEL*
by Derek Carter 24 Feb '11

24 Feb '11

The infrastructure team will be having it's weekly meeting tomorrow with one small change. We will be meeting in the #fedora-admin channel on the Freenode network. We have consistently been bumping up against the Cloud SIG meeting in #fedora-meeting, so we decided to have the meeting in #fedora-admin as we are all there anyway. Topics: (don't feel shy to submit your own) * Fedora 15 alpha tasks: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/query?status=new&status=assi… * Moving things to tx.net * other meeting tagged tickets as they come up: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/query?status=new&status=assi… Submit your agenda items, as tickets in the trac instance and send a note replying to this thread. Thanks -- Derek aka goozbach

1 0

[Change Request] New bodhi release
by Luke Macken 24 Feb '11

24 Feb '11

Hey all, I'd like to push out a new bodhi release this week. Policy Changes - Support the new pre-beta policy - critpath updates only requires 1 proventester karma - non-critpath updates can be pushed to stable after 3 days in testing Changes for AutoQA - Adds the appropriate pending tag upon reacing stablekarma - Remove the pending tags when revoking a request Testing improvements - Query the wiki for test cases upon new update creation and list them in the update These changes do not require any database schema changes, and the bodhi-server can easily be rolled back if things break. luke

3 3

Re: Strange problem with robotics@lists.fedoraproject.org
by Seth Vidal 23 Feb '11

23 Feb '11

On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 10:42 +0100, Tim Niemueller wrote: > On 23.02.2011 04:07, seth vidal wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 16:40 -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 02:51, Tim Niemueller <tim(a)niemueller.de> wrote: > >>> Hello there. > >>> > >>> Last night I got several dozen email of unsubscribe notifications. Since > >>> it's a massive amount I wanted to check back. Has there been a problem > >>> with the mailing list? For some addresses I'd be surprised if they > >>> unsubscribed. > >>> > >> > >> I believe Seth looked at this earlier today. I am not sure what the > >> status of this was. > >> > >> > > > > The answer is -they look like legit bounces. It is not obvious, however, > > that the users are getting notifications that their messages are > > bouncing. > > I'm pretty certain Jef Spaleta, one of the founders of the Robotics SIG, > did not intend to unsubscribe. Since it's a large number of bounces, can > we get some more info on that? Should I re-subscribe the addresses and > let mailman send a notification, so that users can unsubscribe if they > want to? > > I'm just concerned about the large number at the same time, that looks > like a problem on the mailman side. If you think the bounces were in error, then, yes, resub them. It's easy to do it en-masse in the mailman interface. -sv

1 0

[Fwd: [puppet] Fix more indenting]
by Nick Bebout 23 Feb '11

23 Feb '11

The last two patches should fix the root cause of the spams, and extra space before except and pass. I applied these as "emergency" patches also, to avoid flooding root@redhat with like ~20-30 errors per minute Nick ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: [puppet] Fix more indenting From: "Nick Bebout" <nb(a)fedoraproject.org> Date: Tue, February 22, 2011 7:51 pm To: sysadmin-members(a)fedoraproject.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------- commit da94ee041dfe914c90669365feac08c03f1302a6 Author: Nick Bebout <nb(a)puppet01.phx2.fedoraproject.org> Date: Wed Feb 23 01:51:00 2011 +0000 Fix more indenting .../hotfix/files/transifex/tx-simpleauth-views.py | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/modules/hotfix/files/transifex/tx-simpleauth-views.py b/modules/hotfix/files/transifex/tx-simpleauth-views.py index 02bf8e1..e26751e 100644 --- a/modules/hotfix/files/transifex/tx-simpleauth-views.py +++ b/modules/hotfix/files/transifex/tx-simpleauth-views.py @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ def login(request, template_name='simpleauth/signin.html'): try: request.user.message_set.create( message=_("Login is disabled due to migration to fedora.transifex.net.")) - except: + except: pass return HttpResponseRedirect(reverse('transifex.home')) # next = clean_next(request.GET.get('next'))

3 2

Re: Strange problem with robotics@lists.fedoraproject.org
by Stephen John Smoogen 23 Feb '11

23 Feb '11

On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 02:51, Tim Niemueller <tim(a)niemueller.de> wrote: > Hello there. > > Last night I got several dozen email of unsubscribe notifications. Since > it's a massive amount I wanted to check back. Has there been a problem > with the mailing list? For some addresses I'd be surprised if they > unsubscribed. > I believe Seth looked at this earlier today. I am not sure what the status of this was. -- Stephen J Smoogen. "The core skill of innovators is error recovery, not failure avoidance." Randy Nelson, President of Pixar University. "Let us be kind, one to another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle." -- Ian MacLaren

2 1

[(RETROACTIVE) CHANGE REQUEST] [Fwd: [puppet] Set ADMINS to nobody@fpo to stop spamming root@redhat with ~20-30 errors per minute]
by Nick Bebout 23 Feb '11

23 Feb '11

I committed this as an "emergency", since root@redhat was getting about 20-30 emails per minute 2 +1's please? Yeah, this is kind of hacky, but it should work, and I doubt any useful email is being sent to l10n-admins at this time from transifex. Nick ---------------------------- Original Message ---------------------------- Subject: [puppet] Set ADMINS to nobody@fpo to stop spamming root@redhat with ~20-30 errors per minute From: "Nick Bebout" <nb(a)fedoraproject.org> Date: Tue, February 22, 2011 7:38 pm To: sysadmin-members(a)fedoraproject.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------- commit a8c8461cc158d58d666c7fb3b6f2d58dd342f244 Author: Nick Bebout <nb(a)puppet01.phx2.fedoraproject.org> Date: Wed Feb 23 01:38:15 2011 +0000 Set ADMINS to nobody@fpo to stop spamming root@redhat with ~20-30 errors per minute modules/transifex/files/30-site.conf | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/modules/transifex/files/30-site.conf b/modules/transifex/files/30-site.conf index 8cb1824..82d9b18 100644 --- a/modules/transifex/files/30-site.conf +++ b/modules/transifex/files/30-site.conf @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ SITE_ID = 1 SITE_DOMAIN = 'fedoraproject.org' ADMINS = ( - ('Fedora Admins', 'l10n-admin-members(a)fedoraproject.org'), + ('Fedora Admins', 'nobody(a)fedoraproject.org'), ) MANAGERS = ADMINS

4 3

[Change Request] Fix transifex disablement to not traceback w/ search engines
by Toshio Kuratomi 22 Feb '11

22 Feb '11

Search engines are hitting the login page and tripping a traceback. I'd like to apply this patch to our hotfix from yesterday in order to fix that. Issue reported here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/2638 Can I get two +1's? -Toshio

3 2

[Change Request] Disable transifex logins
by Toshio Kuratomi 22 Feb '11

22 Feb '11

As the next step in migrating to transifex.net we would like to disable logging in to the Fedora transifex instance and put up a banner that tells people to use http://fedora.transifex.org/ instead. Can I get to +1's to push this change out to the app servers? -Toshio

4 3

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

infrastructure February 2011