infrastructure September 2021

infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org

29 participants
31 discussions

About JS framework
by Pierre-Yves Chibon 17 Oct '22

17 Oct '22

Good Morning Everyone, Our infrastructure is mostly a python store, meaning almost all our apps are written in python and most using wsgi. However in python we are using a number of framework: * flask for most * pyramid for some of the biggest (bodhi, FAS3) * Django (askbot, Hyperkitty) * TurboGears2 (fedora-packages) * aiohttp (python3, async app: mdapi) While this makes sometime things difficult, these are fairly standard framework and most of our developers are able to help on all. However, as I see us starting to look at JS for some of our apps (fedora-hubs, wartaa...), I wonder if we could start the discussion early about the different framework and eventually see if we can unify around one. This would also allow those of us not familiar with any JS framework to look at the recommended one instead of picking one up semi-randomly. So has anyone experience with one or more JS framework? Do you have one that would you recommend? Why? Thanks for your inputs, Pierre

10 12

Infrastructure and release engineering Documentation
by Mark O'Brien 09 Nov '21

09 Nov '21

Hi All, As some of you may be aware there has been chatter around having the documentation for infrastructure and release engineering centralised in one place. A possible solution to this is to move all of these under a new section on docs.fedoraproject.org called something like Infrastructure and Release Engineering (very original I know). We could then go about moving docs which are suitable from currrent locations to the new central point. Each doc should be updated before moving and the old document should be updated to only contain a link to the new doc to avoid a case of multiple versions of a doc (https://xkcd.com/927/ ). The following links contain the bulk of the documentation: https://fedora-infra-docs.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ https://docs.pagure.org/releng/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure These would be the suggested first steps with other docs to follow if/when these are completed. As I say this is just a possible solution so as always all feedback and suggestions are encouraged and welcomed. Thanks, Mark

4 8

Update hyperkitty to latest?
by Reon Beon 12 Oct '21

12 Oct '21

https://release-monitoring.org/project/53453/

2 2

Fedora 35 Beta Freeze now in effect
by Kevin Fenzi 29 Sep '21

29 Sep '21

Greetings. We are now in the infrastructure freeze leading up to the Fedora 35 Beta release. This is a pre release freeze. We do this to ensure that our infrastructure is stable and ready to release the Fedora 34 Beta when it's available. You can see a list of hosts that do not freeze by checking out the ansible repo and running the freezelist script: git clone https://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/infra/ansible.git ansible/scripts/freezelist -i inventory Any hosts listed as freezes is frozen until 2021-09-14 (or later if release slips). Frozen hosts should have no changes made to them without a sign-off on the change from at least 2 sysadmin-main or rel-eng members, along with (in most cases) a patch of the exact change to be made to this list or a pull request for review. Thanks, Kevin

1 2

Openshift 4 SOP PR review
by David Kirwan 29 Sep '21

29 Sep '21

Hi all, We have put a number of SOPs together, related to Openshift 4, installation and configuration on Fedora Infra, we are hoping to get some feedback! If you get a minute please check the following: https://pagure.io/infra-docs-fpo/pull-request/8 -- David Kirwan Software Engineer Community Platform Engineering @ Red Hat T: +(353) 86-8624108 IM: @dkirwan

5 14

Freeze break request: Deploy Fedora Kinoite static website
by Timothée Ravier 27 Sep '21

27 Sep '21

Hi, I would like to request a FBR to deploy the Fedora Kinoite website (kinoite.fedoraproject.org) before the Beta release (if possible) to be able to link to it in the Beta release notes. This is a static "pre-generated" website with the content hosted in https://pagure.io/fedora-kde/kinoite-site (staging and production branches) and the sources in main. There is a temporary preview at: https://fcos.siosm.fr/kin/ General change request: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora_Kinoite. Infrastructure issue: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/10224 Draft PR (feel free to pick up and fix directly as needed): https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/800 Please let me know if anything is missing here. Thanks!

4 3

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Websites & Apps Team Meeting
by jflory7＠fedoraproject.org 27 Sep '21

27 Sep '21

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Websites & Apps Team Meeting on 2021-09-28 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At https://meet.jit.si/fedora-websites-apps-meeting The meeting will be about: Weekly team meeting for the Websites & Apps Team. This is part of the [Websites & Apps Community Revamp Objective](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Objectives/Websites_%26_Apps_Comm…. See [past discussion]( https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/planning-meeting-for-websites-apps-t…) to learn more about the Websites & Apps Team and how it came together. More information available at: [hackmd.io/Mxm2We3yTqKybLsdohadOA](https://hackmd.io/Mxm2We3yTqKybLsdohadOA?view) Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9990/

1 0

FBR: F35 Beta is Go
by Mohan Boddu 24 Sep '21

24 Sep '21

Hi, Since F35 beta is go now, we can enable bodhi for automated pushes and set the 35 bodhi status to post beta. https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/814 +1's please, Thanks.

1 0

Freeze break request: disable fedmsg-irc bots in most channels
by Kevin Fenzi 24 Sep '21

24 Sep '21

Currently, the fedmsg-irc role connects a number of IRC bots to libera.chat IRC. (Usually 2 per channel, one for production and one for staging). These bots then send fedmsgs that match a specific regex to the channel they are in. As part of setting up matrix rooms and bridging them to IRC, we have realized how noisy these bots tend to be. In almost all cases the tickets/message/event is sent to people who care about it via email or personal FMN notification, so the message in the channel is just noise. Additionally, these fedmsg-irc bots don't have a ton of flexability in what they match on, for example if you say 'perhaps we should add a badge for this' in a ticket, it will then forever notify the #fedora-badges channel about any changes to that ticket. Additionally, fedmsg-irc is python2 and tied to fedmsg (not fedora-messaging). If we can get rid of all use of them that saves us some replacement costs. So, I would like to drop all these bots, except for #fedora-fedmsg and #fedora-fedmsg-stg. I personally think those channels are useful as you can watch the bus flow and tell things about it's health and see overall changes you might not otherwise notice. They might be replaceable by a more simple bot someday. Of course there may be some use case I am not seeing here, so if you _DO_ want these messages in your channel/room still, please tell us! Or if there's some other set of messages that would be of use that would be good to know too, so we could take it into account when/if we work on a matrix bot. Affected channels: #fedora-admin #fedora-commops #fedora-python #fedora-releng #fedora-latam #fedora-g11n #ipsilon #pagure #fedora-design #fedora-docs #fedora-websites #fedora-mktg #fedora-modularity-bots #fedora-diversity #fedora-magazine #fedora-rust #rit-foss #fedora-workstation #koji #fedora-join #fedora-neuro #fedora-badges #centos-ci #fedora-podcast https://pagure.io/fedora-infra/ansible/pull-request/811 is the PR with the changes. kevin

5 4

(retroactive) Freeze break: Proxy adjustments
by Kevin Fenzi 23 Sep '21

23 Sep '21

Yesterday we were having lots of issues with proxy01/10 in IAD2. They would stop processing connections. Restarting httpd seemed to clear it up for a while, then it would get stuck again. My current theory is that we were hitting the limit of 900 clients for some reason and it wasn't processing them correctly when it got to that point. So, I increased that limit to 1500 and also setup a SSL session cache (which it was complaining about that we didn't have). Since then, proxy01/10 with those changes have been running ok. I'd like to push this out to the other proxies now as well, as some of them have been alerting from time to time and it could be this same issue. I already pushed this commit because I wanted 01/10 to be in sync/in git. +1's to push it to the rest of the proxies? commit 313674646df60fc0e8342eff26094f694105cf76 Author: Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> Date: Tue Sep 21 16:19:14 2021 -0700 proxies: increase max workers Also add a ssl connection cache. These changes are live on proxy01/10 and seem to have made them stable again. Will look at pushing to the rest tomorrow. Signed-off-by: Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> diff --git a/inventory/group_vars/proxies b/inventory/group_vars/proxies index c04531a57..5b0a25fee 100644 --- a/inventory/group_vars/proxies +++ b/inventory/group_vars/proxies @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ num_cpus: 6 # This is used in the httpd.conf to determine the value for serverlimit and # maxrequestworkers. On 8gb proxies, 900 seems fine. But on 4gb proxies, this # should be lowered in the host vars for that proxy. -maxrequestworkers: 900 +maxrequestworkers: 1500 tcp_ports: [ # For apache, generally. diff --git a/roles/httpd/proxy/templates/httpd.conf.j2 b/roles/httpd/proxy/templates/httpd.conf.j2 index 00947131f..5b1e0debf 100644 --- a/roles/httpd/proxy/templates/httpd.conf.j2 +++ b/roles/httpd/proxy/templates/httpd.conf.j2 @@ -773,3 +773,5 @@ EnableSendfile on # Configure a location for OCSP stapling SSLStaplingCache shmcb:/tmp/stapling_cache(128000) +SSLSessionCache shmcb:/run/httpd/sslcache(10240000) +SSLSessionCacheTimeout 600 kevin

3 3

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

infrastructure September 2021