Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Before being proposed they would need some polishing, esp the one
> about packaging data seperately needs to be clarified and once it is
> clarified its kinda already in the guidelines (which already contain
> text about having one srpm per upstream tarbal AFAIK), the others are
> mostly little (often important_ details so I'm not sure if they should
> be made into generic guidelines.
> But a pointer to them definetely is a good idea.
I split some of the information in the games sig page into their own sub
pages as it was getting too long and I think more of that needs to be done.
That indeed was necessary
Please clarify any information needed and let me know so that I can
propose adding a link to it to the packaging committee. Weren't you
planning to becoming a member BTW?
I volunteered yes, I haven't heard anything since.