Hi
I noticed that we have some games specific guidelines at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games#head-367e7208aacfec8f8aff1b34c1795e...
Shouldn't that be somewhere under packaging guidelines or atleast be referred to from it? I can propose this as a draft to the packaging committee if the games SIG is supportive of that. For someone newly packaging a game, the games specific packaging guidelines are not visible at all currently.
Rahul
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
I noticed that we have some games specific guidelines at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games#head-367e7208aacfec8f8aff1b34c1795e...
Shouldn't that be somewhere under packaging guidelines or atleast be referred to from it?
A link to it would be good I guess
I can propose this as a draft to the packaging committee if the games SIG is supportive of that. For someone newly packaging a game, the games specific packaging guidelines are not visible at all currently.
Before being proposed they would need some polishing, esp the one about packaging data seperately needs to be clarified and once it is clarified its kinda already in the guidelines (which already contain text about having one srpm per upstream tarbal AFAIK), the others are mostly little (often important_ details so I'm not sure if they should be made into generic guidelines.
But a pointer to them definetely is a good idea.
Regards,
Hans
Hans de Goede wrote:
Before being proposed they would need some polishing, esp the one about packaging data seperately needs to be clarified and once it is clarified its kinda already in the guidelines (which already contain text about having one srpm per upstream tarbal AFAIK), the others are mostly little (often important_ details so I'm not sure if they should be made into generic guidelines.
But a pointer to them definetely is a good idea.
I split some of the information in the games sig page into their own sub pages as it was getting too long and I think more of that needs to be done.
The current guidelines are now at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Games/Packaging
Please clarify any information needed and let me know so that I can propose adding a link to it to the packaging committee. Weren't you planning to becoming a member BTW?
Rahul
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
Before being proposed they would need some polishing, esp the one about packaging data seperately needs to be clarified and once it is clarified its kinda already in the guidelines (which already contain text about having one srpm per upstream tarbal AFAIK), the others are mostly little (often important_ details so I'm not sure if they should be made into generic guidelines.
But a pointer to them definetely is a good idea.
I split some of the information in the games sig page into their own sub pages as it was getting too long and I think more of that needs to be done.
Thanks,
That indeed was necessary
Please clarify any information needed and let me know so that I can propose adding a link to it to the packaging committee. Weren't you planning to becoming a member BTW?
I volunteered yes, I haven't heard anything since.
Regards,
Hans
-
Hans de Goede -
Rahul Sundaram