On Thursday 06 July 2006 16:40, Hans de Goede wrote:
Michael Thomas wrote:
> Hugo Cisneiros wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Since we are (IMO) a integrated group, I had an idea to better
>> communicate our packaging proccess. What if we add the
>> fedora-games-list(a)redhat.com to the CC on our bugzilla review requests
>> and the owners.list (as co-maintainer)?
>>
>> With this we can "ask automatically" if someone here can review the
>> package, or help.
>>
>> I think perl extras sig works in this way too... But can this be the
>> focus on this list? (I think yes). Then, before doing, let's get some
>> opinions :-)
>
> +1 to adding f-g-l to the cc list on reviews.
+1 too
+1 here :-)
Question, thus this complete or replace the tracker on the SIGs wiki,
I
vote for complete. Since I tend to delete mail and if I feel like doing
a review the tracker on the wiki is a good place to start
I think it completes as well. The mail is only a good notification system that
you can always ignore if you want ;) The wiki can be a complete and always
present list.
The question is, can bugzilla send emails to here? bugzilla(a)redhat.com is
allowed to post here?
> -1 to adding f-g-l to the cc field for owners.list, at least
until we
> see how much traffic the bugzilla mail generates.
-1 too, although I might be interested in some game packages bugs (like
libs packages of mine use) I'm not interested in all game packages bugs
and I get way too much mail as is already.
I agree with these opinions.
--
[]'s
Eitch
http://www.devin.com.br/eitch/
"Talk is cheap. Show me the code." - Linus Torvalds