On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 11:38 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
Note: bouncing this to f-docs-l for larger audience and comments.
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 13:21 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> is anyone interested in minor typoes in the online docs? and i mean
> "minor" in the sense that, yes, they should be fixed but, no, i'm not
> about to go thru bugzilla to report them. life's way too short for
> that.
Thanks for noticing and caring. :)
Reporting of typos via email is more likely to get dropped or forgotten
than if they are in a bug. Because of the amount of bugs, changes, and
feature requests that can come in for a document, we use bugzilla as a
tracking tool with some workflow processes.
To alleviate the pain a bit, here are a few ideas:
* Many docs use a prefilled bugzilla report. You click on the link,
fill out two fields and submit. Much less pain. If a document does not
have such a link, it should.
Last November I proposed some standard boilerplate entities for this,
and promptly forgot to implement them. Sorry.
It's in bugzilla here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=139931
If someone else could get this implemented, that would be great.
* Gather a number of typos and include them in a single report,
minimizing time spent in bugzilla. Use a prefilled template, where
possible.
* Get CVS access and fix them yourself.
I think the point is this: if you find typos in a document, you are
likely to group them together into one email already. You won't send a
separate email for every typo, right? Once you've gone that far, it
only takes a few extra, short steps to make a bug report.
Because we can have bugzilla do dependency tracking, properly reported
bugs cannot fall through the cracks.
thx - Karsten
--
fedora-docs-list mailing list
fedora-docs-list(a)redhat.com
To unsubscribe:
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list