On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 23:00 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote:
On Tue 10 May 2005 12:47, Karsten Wade wrote:
I do not see the word "document" in the title. Aside from that, your argument is specious. This is open source software we are using, the ultimate documentation is _always_ the source code. Your inability to understand it does not make it any less valid. Sorry if that is harsh, but it's a common truth.
It's not particularly harsh, just silly. If someone googles for "Fedora tutorial" or whatever, and is directed to an unreadable article, with no instructions as to how to make it readable, they will conclude that Fedora is for pointy-heads.
When you come up with the secret formula for controlling what Google returns, let us know. Otherwise, we can't be responsible for Google finding an informal, alpha document for a version of Fedora Core we no longer document.
- Karsten
Uttered Karsten Wade kwade@redhat.com, spake thus:
When you come up with the secret formula for controlling what Google returns, let us know. Otherwise, we can't be responsible for Google finding an informal, alpha document for a version of Fedora Core we no longer document.
Maybe ROBOTS.TXT somewhere?
Cheers