On 2009-05-01 09:11:11 AM, Axel Thimm wrote:
Maybe if someone gives some detail on why the LDAP setup looked like
too hacky we could find a better solution and use LDAP?
We were basically trying to
use LDAP like a relational DB instead of a
directory, so we were trying to force our entire sponsorship system to
be totally contained in LDAP. Looking back at this, the best approach
with LDAP would probably have been a DB for sponsorship data, and LDAP
for holding approved user/group data. As I mentioned, I'd be interested
in exploring this approach a bit more in the future.