On Fri, 2019-12-13 at 09:21 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 08:00:01AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 12:19:17PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 07, 2019 at 09:39:46AM -0500, Kevin Sandy wrote:
> > > > I have an updated copy working with geoip2, with the exception of
area code data (which isn’t included in the
> > > > new database). But if I’m understanding it’s purpose correctly,
telephone area code isn’t needed. I need to do
> > > > some testing with IPs around the world to ensure that the data is
sane outside the US; once I’ve had a chance to
> > > > do that I’ll submit a PR on GitHub.
> > >
> > > Wow. Awesome work!
> > >
> > > Thanks for diving in and getting this going.
> > >
> > > In another email thread someone, Adrian said he had some code to do
> > > this, but if you already have it working, perhaps he could review your
> > > code/setup and we could then push it into ansible?
> >
> > I had a look at the PR
(
https://github.com/fedora-infra/geoip-city-wsgi/pull/1)
> > and it works and the output is almost the same. Maybe one of the known
> > data consumers can have a short look if those subtle changes in the
> > output are not a problem.
>
> The main user I know of is anaconda and it sounds like the changes work
> for them.
>
> I guess I'd say we should pick a date (likely after the new year now),
> announce we are going to be changing it then a few times, and then on
> that date cut over to the new system.
Sounds good to me (as an Anaconda developer)! :)
BTW, will the new API be available somewhere before that (stagin, etc.) ?
We could patch Anaconda to talk to the new API & do some smoke testing,
just in case. :)
We finally pushed it to Fedora's staging environment. Please try it
using