On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 14:40 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote:
>
> Isn't the CLA supposed to contain the Export Compliance statement? I
> had signed the CLA some long time ago, and it still wants the Export
> Compliance statement from me. Or am I mixing apples and oranges?
>
I'm not sure if the CLA covers this (I don't think it does) but I do
know that you don't need a CLA to be a mirror but you do need to sign
the export agreement. Really we're not the right people to answer a
question like that, anyone know how legal questions like this should be
handled?
I don't think you need a lawyer here. A read of the CLA makes it clear
that it does not cover export control:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/CLA
I've submitted my plain-English CLA to the appropriate legal counsel for
approval -- that means this cannot be relied upon yet -- but it is at
least close to the mark, and may help in clarifying for ya'll what the
CLA is and is not:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/KarstenWade/Drafts/PlainEnglishCLA
IANAL, TINLA, YMMV, caveat emptor, etcetera.
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project
Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. |
fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\