and is done.
On September 13, 2019 5:50:43 PM GMT+02:00, Adam Williamson
<adamwill(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Fri, 2019-09-13 at 13:40 +0100, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 09:23:44 +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
> > Yeah the packages app is really useful and used by many, this is
the main
> > reason it was not included in the application we are currently
working on
> > giving away / retiring. But to be honest I think the priority of
the packages
> > app is quite low. Following are some of the work we have in our
Backlog :
> > • Packager UX improvement.
> > • FAS replacement.
> > • PDC replacement.
> > • OSBS support for aarch64.
> > • End to End testing and monitoring for the flatpak build
pipeline.
> > • Package review process improvement.
> > • Fedora Infra technical debt.
>
> Is there somewhere community members can read more on these tasks of
the
> CPE please?
>
> For the packages app---if it's in maintenance mode, I guess that's OK
> for the time being until something breaks.
>
> There are two aspects of the packages app that aren't available on
> src.fp.o that make it important for me:
>
> - bugz.fp.o/packagename -> but I expect this can be aliased to a
direct
> bugzilla query type URL? "Open bugs" on the packages app heads to
> bugzilla already:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&product...
The feature this doesn't get you is the handy 'open a new bug for this
package' button. Which again can be replicated as a direct Bugzilla
link, but...you need at least a thing to serve a page showing those two
links :)
> There are DDG bangs for bugzilla by the way but they don't search
by
> component (I'll suggest a new one soon): !rbugs, !rhbz
>
> - "Install this package" -> this is critical. I was wondering if
there
> was a way to allow users to "click to install",
There is actually supposed to be a URI format that PackageKit-based
package managers should handle, IIRC, but that was a 2014-vintage thing
or something so no idea if it still works.