On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:50 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Some of you have seen the disk alerts on app2, Looking more closely
it
seems the host was not built with enough disk space (like was app1). So
after the freeze is over I'll rebuild it.
Newbie questions from the peanut gallery :)
Do we have standard kickstarts for systems or are they done by hand?
How are systems provisioned to be built?
Do we use cobbler? Would we be interested in doing so?
What is the flight speed of an unladen swallow?
It does raise a point about storage for transifex though. Basically
each
host running transifex (or damned lies, I can't quite remember which)
keeps a local copy of every scm as part of its usage. For performance
reasons I don't think that will change but its something we'll want to
figure out long term. I haven't done the research but in my brain it
seems like running something like git/hg/svn/bzr over nfs will cause
problems.
On the other hand, these aren't upstream repos but local cache so I'm also
curious what the harm would be, if they get borked one could just delete
the cache and it would repopulate. Thoughts?
-Mike
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- BSD/GNU/Linux
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"