On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 15:17 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 17:05 -0500, Tom Lynema wrote:
> Aurelien and I were quite active on creating a schema that would work
> correctly for out needs. It was a good time. We were and still are
> really close to something that appears to be workable. The resulting
> work is at
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/AccountSystem2/Schema (the link
appears to be down at the moment).
>
This URL should work:
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/AccountSystem2/Schema
Side note: I think there's something screwy with the way
admin.fedoraproject.org handles pages that are in the wiki....
I agree with the screwyness comment. Your link worked.
> We were moving onto writing the actual schema out and getting
it
> validated by a standards body. About that time, Aurelien moved and
> hasn't talked to me about it in a while. He knew more about LDAP than I
> and was going to perform these tasks.
>
I know nothing about LDAP but -- is there a reason schemas should be
validated by a standards body before being tested and used?
It's has to do with the custom schema. We can obtain a number that will
be unique to us so no one can confuse our schema with someone else's. I
don't see it as a necessity though. The governing body is
http://www.iana.org/ .
-Toshio
~tom