O/H Karsten Wade έγραψε:
On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 17:34 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Dimitris Glezos (dimitris(a)glezos.com) said:
>> Our translators have made it clear they want to use a SCM for the translations
>> and said an *additional* web-based tool would be nice. So, let's first
create
>> our SCM and we'll see about whether we should use pootle.
> Use *one* SCM. How to gate currently hosted GIT/HG/etc into this is
> unclear. :/
A first iteration at a solution could look like this:
* Projects, regardless of SCM, generate POT file and use WUI or CLI to
schedule pick-up of their POT into l10n.fp.o
* l10n.fp.o has a WUI that sits in front of >1 SCM and has the ability
to:
- Translate through the WUI (download POT, upload PO)
- Use one account (FAS) for all access (regardless of back-end SCM, it
needs a *l10n group that all L10N members are within)
- Provide statistics across all SCMs
* For translators who want to use the CLI entirely for translations,
they need to work directly with the SCM, however ...
Note that I suggest a CLI for access to the same services the WUI is
providing. The idea here would be to grow a CLI (fedoral10n?) that acts
like the WUI - it interacts with >1 back-end SCM, uses FAS for auth+,
etc.
So, first feature of the fedoral10n CLI would be for developers (and
scripts) to automate the management of POT/PO files. Second feature
would be to give translators equivalent control that the WUI provides.
So, we've got two issues with L10N:
1. Enabling proper ACLs on CVS
2. The Web User Interface
Mike is working on the first.
An RFR for this has been opened at:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/RFR/L10nCVSandUI
-d
--
Dimitris Glezos
Jabber ID: glezos(a)jabber.org, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B
http://dimitris.glezos.com/
"He who gives up functionality for ease of use
loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous)
--