On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 01:06:06AM -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2007 at 12:49:31AM -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
> Option 3: Roll our own TurboGears wiki
> - We're in control (workflow, features, upstream, etc.)
> - Integration with FAS is trivial
> - Almost no current specifications
> - Minimal existing code (based on requirements)
> - Smaller developer base
> - Content many need to be transcribed (based on requirements)
> - GSoC work may need retooling (based on requirements)
Won't there be performance problems with a TurboGears-based wiki? I
thought MirrorManager was having issues with TG performance and had to
enable form-data caching to get acceptable performance at the cost of
possibly stale data. I don't know the details behind it, but that was
the reason I was given for why when you edit forms in MM it sometimes
returns old pre-edit field values.
correct. Now, my TG-foo may not strong enough to overcome this, but
perhaps it's easier for others?
I'm still not convinced to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
Linux Technology Strategist, Dell Office of the CTO