On Sun, April 27, 2008 11:01 pm, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
Nigel Jones wrote:
> Looking through my email, from what I can recall there are no false
> positives. xen6 had to be power-cycled which caused all the other
> collateral notifications.
>
Collateral notifications can be caught using service dependencies and
parent hosts. Do we currently use any?
I believe we do, but it wouldn't have
helped in this case (I've done a bit
more digging)
Half the notifications came from the external nagios instance on noc2,
while the xen6/db alerts came from the internal nagios instance. Another
reason why I like the current setup and don't think we should change a
thing :)
Also, the UNKNOWN alerts weren't that bad, they were a precursor to the
box having to restarted, only in this case was the up/down alerts a little
useless. However, I'd sooner keep them as it because otherwise we run the
risk of not noticing a box down immediately and get everyone under the
moon asking "why can't I access fedoraproject.org... it's down your OS
can't be that good".
- Nigel
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list