On Fri, 9 Nov 2007, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 12:16 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> The managemetn side of mirrormanager is. But the "serve out the
> existing mirror information" side is perfectly fine without FAS (and
> realistically, is the part that more of us think of when we think MM)
in my mind:
mirrormanger - the management side
mirrorlist - the actual mirrorlists
Ditto.
I do agree, though, that we could probably make mirrorlist redundant
without necessarily making mirrormanager so, and that would fulfill most
of our needs.
Jima