On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 6:28 AM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath(a)redhat.com> wrote:
So it is probably time to have a
dev.fedoraproject.org. Why? Well,
toshio had mentioned having others do some of the 'sysadminy' tasks so
developers can focus on development.
Also Luke had an analogous request wrt community and staging but before I
go setting things up some topics for discussion:
1) Security staging and production are identical. Since production data
regularly gets migrated to staging people that have access to one, might
as well have access to the other. Generally our staging environment is
mostly used for integration work, some load work as well.
2) Should we run development from rpms that get edited (like live patches)
or should we run them from scm(ish) checkouts. I generally vote for the
latter as it feels more useful in a development lifecycle. But we should
+1 for scm chekouts
also save time that way.
come up with a quick standard for how to store this stuff. something
like
/srv/dev/
yeah, fine for me.
3) I don't want this to be all fancy. All of our apps run in their own
namespaces so we should be able to get by with one or two app dev servers
and we should be able to use them without a reverse proxy.
Questions comments? It'd be nice to just throw them all together on a
couple of hosts in their own namespace. It'll help find issues with them
playing together.
Well we could use them with something like "dev.fp.o/myapp"
"dev.fp.o/myapp2"
Just like we're doing for admin.fp.o
Also have a subdomain dev is great. Maybe a home page would be good as well,
just my two cents.
--
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB