On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com> wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jun 2016 17:28:43 -0400
Matthew Miller <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 11:32:39AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> > > Yeah, I think what we need is a "Fedora Docker" product.
> > > ie, at this level:
> > > Is "Fedora Docker" the right name for the product?
> > I'm honestly not sure, I'd like to get mattdm and/or the Council to
> > chime in on that. I'm definitely not the right person for selecting
> > the color of the bike shed.
>
> I was first thinking "Fedora Docker Layered Images" — it's longish but
> accurately descriptive. But then I thought: actually, we don't have a
> clear bug-reporting home for _base_ images (other than pagure for the
> fedora-kickstarts). So, if it isn't too ugly to overload the namespace
> just a little bit, we could just do "Fedora Docker Images".
>
> What do you all think?
Sure, works for me.
Where do we need to submit the request for the new component to be
created in BZ?
-AdamM
>
> kevin
>
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/infrastructure@lists.fedorapr...
>