On Mon, 2019-05-20 at 13:11 -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote:
On 5/20/19 12:56 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
> I don't see that running our own pastebin is valuable to the
> community. There are plenty of other options for people to post things
> (
pastebin.com, GitHub gists, put a file in your web space on Fedora
> people, etc). I'm in favor of option 3, with a long enough timeline
> for the fpaste maintainers to handle the change and for the docs team
> to make sure we update any docs that refer to pase.fp.o accordingly
> (if any)
>
+1 to Option 3.
My biggest use for paste.fp.o is via fpaste in CLI. To me, it also makes
more sense to use an existing service and point the fpaste tool there.
So long as fpaste continues to work, my use case and likely others' does
not break.
Agreed, as long as fpaste continues to be working and puts the pasted
text somewhere sensible
all would be more or less fine.
BTW, fpaste is available in the installation environment (both live & netinst images)
and is pretty handy for debugging various installation related issues as you can't
simply fpaste the relevant logs/error messaages and retrieve it on a different
computer by re-typing the URL. This is likely the easiest method for extracting logs
from a failed/invalid installation, others are more complicated (scp, mounting a flash
drive,
filling in a libreport form).
Actually, if any fpaste changes can give us a shorter to type URL, this would be very
welcome. :)
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedora...