On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 08:12:18AM -0400, Justin W. Flory wrote:
On 11/03/2016 07:18 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> This morning I started looking at migration our license agreements from FAS2 to
> FAS3.
>
> We currently have 8 CLAs in FAS2:
> - cla_dell
> - cla_done
> - cla_ibm
> - cla_fedora
> - cla_redhat
> - cla_click
> - cla_intel
> - cla_fpca
>
> For the moment, in the migration script I created a dummy license agreement:
> `cla_fpca` and migrated all the people member of the `cla_fpca` group in FAS2 as
> having signed that new license agreement.
>
> The question I have is basically: do we want to migrate all 8 CLAs by creating
> their respective LAs in FAS3 and migrating their members or are we only
> interested in the FPCA group these days?
>
> Thoughts?
>
From a usability standpoint, even though these groups are deprecated, I
still see a notable number of new people apply to these groups (even if
they're not employees of said companies). It can also be a little confusing
with the FPCA in place too. If it's easy to do so, it's my opinion that it
would make more sense to keep it all to one group. :)
My preference is also to just keep cla_fpca and call it a day, but then we loose
some data/history.
So the question is: do we care about that data/history?
Since those CLAs are no longer used, we could no care, I just want to make sure
it's the case :)
Thanks,
Pierre