Just my thoughts:
Hi all,
This is the first email with trying to better prioritize our backlog of
ticket (
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issues ).
So let's look at 5 tickets and rate them using the following categories :
* low-trouble, medium-trouble, high-trouble
* low-gain, medium-gain, high-gain
#8455 Move mailman to newer release of Fedora or CentOS -
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8455
Trouble : high
Gain : high
This one blocks other two issues and as reported in comments the
currently deployed version suffers of at least one XSS leak, so I would mark as really
high priority.
But if we have to put very high effort to fix it, it could be better to make the effort to
upgrade to mailman3 that is actively developed.
#8167 Adding topic authorization to our RabbitMQ instances -
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8167
Trouble : low
Gain : medium
It seems the only things left are to adjust the config file and see
if everything works in staging, so I'll mark low trouble.
#8035 A few final ansible secrets for kerneltest -
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/8035
Trouble : ?
Gain : ?
#7935 Nightlies (Rawhide and Branched) not imported to PDC -
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7935
Trouble : ?
Gain : ?
I see recent nightlies of F32 and Rawhide in PDC, is it fixed?
#7919 Fix fas fedmsg sending in openshift -
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/7919
Trouble : ?
Gain : low
fas is being replaced, I don't think it worths to have it fixed.
>
>
> Let's also use this thread to ask questions and clarifications if needed.
> Also if you have any ideas or feedback on how to improve that process I am
> happy to hear about it :-).
>
>
> Thanks
> Clément