On 08/09/16, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Sep 2016 11:24:14 -0500
> Adam Miller <maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Sep 3, 2016 at 12:58 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin(a)scrye.com>
> > wrote:
> > > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 11:43:11 -0500
> > > Adam Miller <maxamillion(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello all,
> > >> I recently wrote a request/proposal to the websites team
> > >> for a "latest" download URL[0] for the Atomic Host release
> > >> artifacts such that someone could always point to the latest
> > >> URL and it would return whatever the most recently released
> > >> Two Wee Atomic Host image was. It was suggested that the
> > >> websites might not be the best place for this so I was curious
> > >> how I might best go about adding this to
> > >>
download.fedoraproject.org (or where ever might be more
> > >> appropriate).
> > >
> > > So is this a static link that we just need to make once? Or is
> > > it something that would change with every 2 week release?
> >
> > It would change every 2 week release. Is there any way to have it
> > auto-generated via fedmsg data? The needed information is sent to
> > fedmsg currently.
>
> Well, not easily, but we could come up with something I suppose.
>
> We do have some automation that runs based on fedmsg and could run
> ansible, but I'd be concerned that this config would then be outside
> our ansible repo. I suppose we could setup something to commit and
> push too, but not sure how accident prone that might end up being.
>
> What does a two week atomic download url look like right now?
>
Below are few links from the latest release.
https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/CloudImages/x86_...
https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/CloudImages/x86_...
https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/CloudImages/x86_...
https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/atomic/stable/CloudImages/x86_...
Can we adjust the compose script to just make in that same directory
some links that replace the '20160820.0' with 'latest' ? then we can
just have the web point to 'latest' versions and done?
kevin