Re: F9 thermal issue
by fnol
----- Original Message ----
> From: g <geleem(a)bellsouth.net>
> To: For users of Fedora <fedora-list(a)redhat.com>
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 5:58:02 AM
> Subject: Re: F9 thermal issue
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> J. A. wrote:
> > I installed F9 on a Acer Aspire 5720 and the PC goes hot after approx. 30min
> and turns of without any warnings or log items.
> > The issue is that the fan never starts.
>
> have you updated your bios?
>
On my way, I found some issues with Acer and APIC errors which might be related.
The solution was to upgrade BIOS, unfortantly I have to re-install Vista or DOS :-(
Thanks, for your reply.
>
> - --
> tc,hago.
>
> g
> .
>
> in a free world without fences, who needs gates.
>
> learn linux:
> 'Rute User's Tutorial and Exposition' http://rute.2038bug.com/index.html.gz
> 'The Linux Documentation Project' http://www.tldp.org/
> 'HowtoForge' http://howtoforge.com/
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Red Hat - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFIrjlK+C4Bj9Rkw/wRAqVbAKDBEoixC550hLUp4f1GPtbxNyNFDACgzTdw
> 5bYbXJUjgLSbZjnGC+iXhSQ=
> =mJnU
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> --
> fedora-list mailing list
> fedora-list(a)redhat.com
> To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
15 years, 10 months
hibernate does not work (system will restart)
by David Hláčik
Hello,
i have just noticed ,that with newest kernel hibernation does not work
on my computer. When i will press hibernate / or it will automatically
hibernate (power management - hibernation with NB on battery) computer
will normally shut down.
During kernel boot NB restart itself . Hibernation is corrupted.
[boss@david ~]$ uname -a
Linux david 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686 #1 SMP Mon Aug 4 14:08:11 EDT 2008
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
David.
15 years, 10 months
Firefox-3.0.1 can't find Bookmarks
by Jim
FC9, Firefox-3.0.1
The Bookmarks I moved into .mozillia/firefox-default folder from another
box and Firefox-3.
The bookmarks I put on my laptop in .mozillia/firefox-default folder
can't be read by Firefox-3 , even if I do a "import"
of Bookmarks it can't find any Bookmarks, I have a copy in my /home/user
directory.
It still is reading the old Bookmark file that I deleted from
.mozillia/Firefox-default folder
15 years, 10 months
Re: Infrastructure status, 2008-08-19 UTC 0200
by Tim
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 02:07 +0000, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> ** New SSH fingerprint for Fedora Hosted:
> e6:b3:68:51:98:2d:4c:dc:63:27:46:65:51:d5:f0:7a
Is it just me, or do others also think that a public email (even a
signed one) would be almost the worst place to trust a fingerprint
announcement?
--
[tim@localhost ~]$ uname -r
2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686
Don't send private replies to my address, the mailbox is ignored. I
read messages from the public lists.
15 years, 10 months
Import Firefox profile from Windows to Linux
by Jay Mistry
Is it possible to import the Firefox profile folder (with extensions,
add-ons, preferences, etc) from a Windows install onto Fedora (FC 9),
without any loss of function?
15 years, 10 months
network vs NetworkManger services ??
by Bill Case
Hi;
NetworkManager has apparently screwed up a lot of small Gnome processes.
* Trouble with Evo getting itself stuck in downloading mail
(looping ??).
* Clock applet not getting task and calendar info from Evolution
properly.
* I have been told that NM configuration info and keys should be
in my gconf-editor. They are not.
* A couple of other little things (I forget now) not operating
properly after turning NetworkManager off and on.
I will see if I can get help with NetworkManager on the
networkmanager-list(a)gnome.org , but meanwhile, so as to avoid asking
really stupid questions in more than one place. Is the 'network'
service supposed to be running while the NetworkManager service is on?
Is it compiled into the kernel? I thought it was a module? Are those
questions even relevant?
ps aux shows NetworkManager but no 'network' or friends.
The command line shows:
]# service network status
Configured devices:
lo eth0
Currently active devices:
lo eth0
]# service network stop
Shutting down interface eth0: [ OK ]
Shutting down loopback interface: [ OK ]
and then;
]# service network status
Configured devices:
lo eth0
Currently active devices:
lo eth0
There is no Fedora manual or 'Help' for NetworkManager
'man NetworkManager' produces only:
"DESCRIPTION
The NetworkManager daemon attempts to keep an active
network connection available at all times. The point of
NetworkManager is to make networking configuration and setup
as painless and automatic as possible. If using DHCP,
NetworkManager is intended to replace default routes,obtain
IP addresses from a DHCP server, and change nameservers whenever
it sees fit, with the aim of making networking Just Work."
nm-tool shows me no more info than is available in the NM gui.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Tools/NetworkManager simply tells me how
to configure for pam. My pam.d/gdm is
auth optional pam_gnome_keyring.so
session optional pam_gnome_keyring.so auto_start
googled sites gives info for gentoo and mandrivia only.
I am stumped. I will re-ask on the NetworkManager list, but first I
would like to straighten out in my mind the network vs NetworkManger
services thing.
--
Regards Bill;
Fedora 9, Gnome 2.22.3
Evo.2.22.3.1, Emacs 22.2.1
15 years, 10 months
hibernate question
by David Hláčik
Hello, which services are responsible for hibernation?
Is this only kernel question?
Does drivers needs to support hibernation too?
Thanks!
D.
15 years, 10 months
Non-urgent query re: yum ?
by Bill Case
Hi;
Does yum have a 'file' switch or option like most other programs dealing
with several pieces of data? eg. rsync --files-from /where/ever.
I just re-installed Fedora 9 and I probably will be installing F10 in a
couple of months. I keep a list of 15 -20 packages that I regularly
have to re-install right after the Fedora core installation.
It would be nice and easy to just 'yum install --from-file
~/billspackagelist' or after a disaster 'yum install
--from-file /backup/billspackagelist'
Maybe there is a way to do it without copying and pasting a long string
of package names and having to check for proper name separation etc. at
the end of 'yum install ...', but I didn't see it.
--
Regards Bill;
Fedora 9, Gnome 2.22.3
Evo.2.22.3.1, Emacs 22.2.1
15 years, 10 months
Yum issue
by Joseph L. Casale
I am trying to install a few apps via yum but I am having issues.
I have glibc installed for example which is one of the issues reported?
[root@fc9 ~]# rpm -qa | grep glibc
glibc-2.8-8.i686
glibc-common-2.8-8.i386
So why does
[root@fc9 ~]# yum install gcc make patch kernel-devel openssl-devel
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, priorities, refresh-packagekit
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
* livna: livna.cat.pdx.edu
* fedora: mirror.cpsc.ucalgary.ca
* adobe-linux-i386: linuxdownload.adobe.com
* updates: mirror.cpsc.ucalgary.ca
2727 packages excluded due to repository priority protections
Setting up Install Process
Parsing package install arguments
Package 1:make-3.81-12.fc9.i386 already installed and latest version
Package matching patch-2.5.4-32.fc9.i386 already installed. Checking for update.
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
---> Package openssl-devel.i386 0:0.9.8g-6.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: zlib-devel for package: openssl-devel
--> Processing Dependency: openssl = 0.9.8g-6.fc9 for package: openssl-devel
--> Processing Dependency: krb5-devel for package: openssl-devel
---> Package kernel-devel.i686 0:2.6.25-14.fc9 set to be installed
---> Package gcc.i386 0:4.3.0-8 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: glibc-devel >= 2.2.90-12 for package: gcc
--> Running transaction check
---> Package zlib-devel.i386 0:1.2.3-18.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package glibc-devel.i386 0:2.8-3 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: glibc-headers = 2.8-3 for package: glibc-devel
--> Processing Dependency: glibc = 2.8-3 for package: glibc-devel
---> Package krb5-devel.i386 0:1.6.3-10.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: e2fsprogs-devel for package: krb5-devel
--> Processing Dependency: keyutils-libs-devel for package: krb5-devel
--> Processing Dependency: libselinux-devel for package: krb5-devel
---> Package openssl.i386 0:0.9.8g-6.fc9 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
---> Package libselinux-devel.i386 0:2.0.61-1.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libsepol-devel >= 2.0.18-2 for package: libselinux-devel
--> Processing Dependency: libselinux = 2.0.61-1.fc9 for package: libselinux-devel
---> Package glibc-headers.i386 0:2.8-3 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: kernel-headers for package: glibc-headers
--> Processing Dependency: kernel-headers >= 2.2.1 for package: glibc-headers
---> Package e2fsprogs-devel.i386 0:1.40.8-2.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: device-mapper-devel >= 1.02.02-3 for package: e2fsprogs-devel
--> Processing Dependency: e2fsprogs-libs = 1.40.8-2.fc9 for package: e2fsprogs-devel
---> Package glibc.i386 0:2.8-3 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.8-3 for package: glibc
---> Package keyutils-libs-devel.i386 0:1.2-3.fc9 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
---> Package libsepol-devel.i386 0:2.0.26-1.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libsepol = 2.0.26-1.fc9 for package: libsepol-devel
---> Package kernel-headers.i386 0:2.6.25-14.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package libselinux-devel.i386 0:2.0.61-1.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: libselinux = 2.0.61-1.fc9 for package: libselinux-devel
---> Package device-mapper-devel.i386 0:1.02.24-11.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package e2fsprogs-devel.i386 0:1.40.8-2.fc9 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: e2fsprogs-libs = 1.40.8-2.fc9 for package: e2fsprogs-devel
---> Package glibc.i386 0:2.8-3 set to be updated
--> Processing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.8-3 for package: glibc
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
glibc-2.8-3.i386 from fedora has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.8-3 is needed by package glibc-2.8-3.i386 (fedora)
e2fsprogs-devel-1.40.8-2.fc9.i386 from fedora has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: e2fsprogs-libs = 1.40.8-2.fc9 is needed by package e2fsprogs-devel-1.40.8-2.fc9.i386 (fedora)
libselinux-devel-2.0.61-1.fc9.i386 from fedora has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: libselinux = 2.0.61-1.fc9 is needed by package libselinux-devel-2.0.61-1.fc9.i386 (fedora)
libsepol-devel-2.0.26-1.fc9.i386 from fedora has depsolving problems
--> Missing Dependency: libsepol = 2.0.26-1.fc9 is needed by package libsepol-devel-2.0.26-1.fc9.i386 (fedora)
Error: Missing Dependency: glibc-common = 2.8-3 is needed by package glibc-2.8-3.i386 (fedora)
Error: Missing Dependency: libselinux = 2.0.61-1.fc9 is needed by package libselinux-devel-2.0.61-1.fc9.i386 (fedora)
Error: Missing Dependency: e2fsprogs-libs = 1.40.8-2.fc9 is needed by package e2fsprogs-devel-1.40.8-2.fc9.i386 (fedora)
Error: Missing Dependency: libsepol = 2.0.26-1.fc9 is needed by package libsepol-devel-2.0.26-1.fc9.i386 (fedora)
Any hints would be appreciated! Are there also yum issues in fc9 like the ones in RH 5.2?
Thanks!
jlc
15 years, 10 months
Re: Infrastructure report, 2008-08-22 UTC 1200
by Joel Rees
On Aug 22, 2008, at 9:00 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> [Information on the intrusion, etc.]
This time through has been a little bit rough. Nothing like a first
time ...
Not all the information I want, yet, but definitely much better than
what Microsoft gives out.
Thanks.
Joel Rees
15 years, 10 months