On 11/16/2010 02:54 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 20:34 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Jesse Keating (jkeating(a)redhat.com) said:
>>> Do you think it's appropriate to keep it this way or should I change it?
>>> The reason why I do it this way is, that pungi doesn't pull optional
>>> comps packages in the media kit. Any idea how to work this around
>>> without having an extra script?
>> To date, all spins have been either live media, or a virt image that is
>> quite similar. However you mention using pungi, which means you're
>> making a more traditional install media, as opposed to live media.
>> Basically you're just adjusting what packages are or are not on the DVD
>> media we generate as part of a Fedora release?
> ... I'm confused why you'd do this as well. How many people install their
> servers from *media*? (That being said, it would be interesting to
> benchmark an image-based installation of @core, but given that anaconda
> won't run on that...)
I always install my own servers from "media". Often it's an ISO given to
a VM, but it is always from an ISO. Never a pre-packaged image, etc.
Jon.
I also prefer media (or ISO). I suppose there will be still lot of people
using media. We can see that after releasing spin from number of
downloads.
--
Marcela Mašláňová
BaseOS team Brno