server April 2015

server@lists.fedoraproject.org

18 participants
15 discussions

Starting the Talking Points for F22
by Joe Brockmeier 18 May '15

18 May '15

Hey all, Have put up the page for talking points for this release: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_talking_points What we want to get to is a coherent story for Fedora 22 so marketing can weave that into the beta and final announcements, plus Ambassadors can use the talking points when they're at events (etc.), and for anybody who's talking to press about the F22 release. Cross-posting to working group lists to get feedback on the Cloud, Server, and Workstation editions. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier | Principal Cloud & Storage Analyst jzb(a)redhat.com | http://community.redhat.com/ Twitter: @jzb | http://dissociatedpress.net/

5 8

Server SIG Weekly Meeting Minutes (2015-04-28)
by Stephen Gallagher 28 Apr '15

28 Apr '15

========================================================= #fedora-meeting-1: Server SIG Weekly Meeting (2015-04-28) ========================================================= Meeting started by sgallagh at 15:00:08 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-04-28/fedora -meeting-1.2015-04-28-15.00.log.html . Meeting summary --------------- * roll call (sgallagh, 15:00:08) * Agenda (sgallagh, 15:06:15) * Agenda Item: F23 Planning (sgallagh, 15:06:21) * F23 Planning (sgallagh, 15:09:19) * LINK: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/server/2015-April/001842.html (sgallagh, 15:10:02) * libabigail includes an abidiff tool which is pretty handy and could be plugged into a taskotron test (sgallagh, 15:20:14) * Formulate concrete plans at next week's Server SIG meeting (sgallagh, 15:40:50) * ACTION: stefw to start a conversation about package/security updates on the mailing list (sgallagh, 16:02:16) Meeting ended at 16:13:00 UTC. Action Items ------------ * stefw to start a conversation about package/security updates on the mailing list Action Items, by person ----------------------- * stefw * stefw to start a conversation about package/security updates on the mailing list * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * sgallagh (120) * simo (105) * stefw (78) * nirik (47) * adamw (23) * zodbot (9) * randomuser (7) * jonmasters_ (4) * bochecha (2) * mitr (0) * danofsatx (0) * tuanta (0) * mizmo (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 0

Call for agenda for Server SIG Weekly Meeting (2015-04-28)
by Stephen Gallagher 28 Apr '15

28 Apr '15

This week, I think we need to discuss plans for Fedora 23. Many people continue to ask if Fedora Server plans to have a long-term maintenance release in the future. Thus far, we've all been pretty much in agreement that we aren't ready for that. The problem with a long-term release is, of course, personnel. It's not terribly exciting to provide support on older (sometimes outdated) packages, so no one really wants to do it without a really compelling reason (in Ubuntu, this is usually - but not always - a paycheck from Canonical). However, a long-term maintenance release is a potential _solution_, not a description of the problem. Looking at the real problem behind it, the issue is actually "I need a guarantee that software I run atop this is expected to continue working for X months/years." What this really means is that the supported APIs and ABIs on the system continue to behave the same way for an extended period of time. This is orthogonal to the problem of packages. So my proposal for Fedora 23 is that we de-emphasize the user-visible engineering for a release in favor of working on tools to enable us to better maintain API and ABI across releases. For example, I think we need to be developing a taskotron tool to monitor for C/C++ ABI changes in any /usr/lib[64] library that we ship in the default Fedora Server install. Such a tool should disable auto-pushing to stable if the ABI changes in an incompatible way. The other thing we should be doing is gathering API documentation into a common place where we can decide which of the default packages we install should be considered "stable" API (possibly defined as "stuff we agree must work for 2-4 releases, even if this means maintaining a compat package for a while"). So in short, my proposal is for us to research what we are shipping in terms of libraries and APIs (such as D-BUS), gather their documentation in one place and use this as a basis to build tools to help us ensure that they stay functional for multiple releases. Let's discuss this at the meeting today.

1 0

2015-04-28 @ 1600 UTC Fedora Blocker Review Meeting
by Adam Williamson 28 Apr '15

28 Apr '15

# F22 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2015-04-28 # Time: 1600 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Sorry for the mix-up yesterday - apparently we do have blockers to review! So I'm proposing we do it at the usual time today, 04-28. If enough people show up, we can blow through the list, otherwise we'll try and re-schedule it for another day. We have 9 proposed Final blockers to go through. As usual, we're meeting at 1600 UTC. The full list can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F22 can be found on the wiki [0]. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net

1 0

Agenda Request for 2015-04-21 Server SIG Meeting
by Stephen Gallagher 21 Apr '15

21 Apr '15

What is on this week's agenda, folks? I think we probably need to figure out what our top priorities are for Final release. I suspect we need to do some work with the marketing, websites and ambassador teams to ready them for the release.

1 0

Beta blocker/FE update karma requests
by Adam Williamson 15 Apr '15

15 Apr '15

Hi folks! As some of you know, part of the release validation process is to make sure the fixes for blocker and freeze exception bugs are tested and confirmed, and give karma to the updates so they can be pushed to stable. For F22 Beta, the following updates for blocker/FE bugs have been included in Beta RC2, and we need to confirm the fixes and provide karma. It would be great if folks could help with this. Of course not everyone will have the necessary configuration or Cloud accounts or whatever to test every fix, don't worry! Just do whatever you can if you have some time to help out. * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4820/cloud-utils-0.27-1… This one fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197894 . You can give it +1 karma if you test a 22 Beta RC2 Cloud image - see the test cases at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Beta_RC2_Cloud - and find that it boots successfully and the root partition is resized to fit the space available. * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/util-linux-2.26.1-1.fc22 This one fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210428 . It's another Cloud issue: to test this one, you need to deploy a cloud instance and then reboot it. If that works (and the resize still happens), you can +1 the update. * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5751/gnome-boxes-3.16.0… This one fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164492 . You can give it +1 karma if you boot the 22 Beta RC2 Workstation live image (any arch) and confirm that the libvirt default NAT network configuration is *not* set up: that is, there's no virbr0 interface, and the package libvirt-daemon-config-network is not installed. * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5960/realmd-0.15.2-2.fc… This one fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210483 . Testing the blocker fix requires you to have an Active Directory domain controller available (you'd have to install Fedora 22 Beta RC2 Server and then enrol the newly installed system in the AD domain using realmd - test cases at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_22_Beta_RC2_Server#Domai… - but if you have a FreeIPA domain you could at least check this realmd build works OK for enrolling in that domain. * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4922/rolekit-0.3.2-1.fc… This fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209602 and also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207872 (an FE bug), both related to deployment of the database 'Server Role'. To test it, install Fedora 22 Beta RC2 Server (DVD, or if you use the netinst, ensure you get that version of rolekit from updates-testing) and then try to deploy the database server role...which I can't find any instructions for ATM, but sgallagh might be able to provide some. Then check you can log into the deployed pgsql instance with the password from the role config. * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5686/kwin-5.2.2-2.fc22 This fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210861 , an FE issue. You can +1 it so long as the F22 Beta RC2 KDE live image seems to be basically working fine and this update doesn't seem to cause any issues - kwin is involved in just about anything you do in KDE, obviously, so as long as the KDE validation tests are good we can be pretty confident this is fine. * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4553/libzip-0.11.2-5.fc… This fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204677 , an FE security issue. I don't know the details of how to verify the security fix is good, but you can give it a general +1 if zip file manipulation in dependent packages seems to be working. "sudo repoquery --whatrequires libzip" will list packages with a direct dep on libzip. * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-5161/plasma-workspace-5… This fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207079 , another FE issue. Test for this one is pretty simple: make sure you get a screenshot when you press the 'Print Screen' key in 22 Beta RC2 KDE. * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4727/qt5-qtwebkit-5.4.1… This fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204796 , another FE security issue, also in KDE. Going by the bug description, to verify the fix you'd need to check what was logged in the file 'WebpageIcons.db' somehow (I'm assuming it's a simple DB mapping URLs to favicons), but you can give it a general +1 if web browsing with Konqueror works OK in 22 Beta RC2 KDE. Again, whatever help folks can provide on testing these would be great - thanks! And of course, we need all the help we can get filling out the Beta RC2 test matrices, see https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test-announce/2015-April/001040.h… for all the details on that. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net

2 1

Call for Agenda for 2015-04-14 Server WG Meeting
by Stephen Gallagher 14 Apr '15

14 Apr '15

For the first time in a while, I'm sending out the agenda request ahead of time. What do we have, other than Beta readiness?

1 0

Fedora Server lifecycle
by Carlos Raúl Laguna 10 Apr '15

10 Apr '15

Hello to everyone, I have a question about lifecycle, i read the draft proposal https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Server/Proposals/Server_Lifecycle , but that is 2013 old ? Any actual news on this, i am about to deploy a freeipa environment in one hand i have centos 7 ipa 4.1.0 and Fedora 21 server 4.1.2 with several bugs corrected in the other can anyone point me some more recent direction in this topic. Regard

8 12

Server SIG Weekly Meeting Minutes (2015-04-07)
by Stephen Gallagher 07 Apr '15

07 Apr '15

========================================================= #fedora-meeting-1: Server SIG Weekly Meeting (2015-04-07) ========================================================= Meeting started by sgallagh at 15:00:54 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-04-07/fedora-meeting… . Meeting summary --------------- * roll call (sgallagh, 15:00:54) * Agenda (sgallagh, 15:04:41) * Agenda Item: F22 Beta Testing (sgallagh, 15:04:46) * Agenda Item: F22 Talking Points (sgallagh, 15:04:46) * Agenda Item: NTP (sgallagh, 15:04:46) * F22 Beta Testing (sgallagh, 15:06:12) * Help needed to convert Database Server Role requirements into a test plan (sgallagh, 15:09:54) * LINK: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_test_case_creation (sgallagh, 15:11:00) * ACTION: sgallagh to write up a Database Role test plan today (sgallagh, 15:16:49) * Agenda Item: F22 Talking Points (sgallagh, 15:18:25) * Talking Point: Database Server Role (sgallagh, 15:19:38) * Talking Point: Default to XFS filesystem (sgallagh, 15:19:54) * Talking Point: From Fedora 22 onwards, Cockpit will be compatible between OS releases (sgallagh, 15:21:51) * Talking Point: Fedora Server supports Docker containers on the armv7hl architecture (sgallagh, 15:25:52) * Talking Point: DNF as the default package manager (sgallagh, 15:28:06) * Talking Point: Ipsilon - new multiple-protocol identity provider service (sgallagh, 15:28:57) * NTP (sgallagh, 15:32:31) * We'll stick with chrony by default in F22, with the Server Role replacing it with NTP if deployed. (sgallagh, 15:44:30) * Plans for F23 include doing an analysis of the relative benefits of chrony, ntp and timesyncd and switching everything to the one that makes the most sense. (sgallagh, 15:45:06) * Open Floor (sgallagh, 15:46:51) Meeting ended at 15:49:30 UTC. Action Items ------------ * sgallagh to write up a Database Role test plan today Action Items, by person ----------------------- * sgallagh * sgallagh to write up a Database Role test plan today * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * sgallagh (83) * adamw (24) * simo (17) * nirik (16) * mitr (9) * zodbot (8) * junland (3) * stefw (3) * jsmith (1) * mizmo (1) * danofsatx (0) * tuanta (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

1 0

chrony, ntp, timesyncd?
by Chris Murphy 07 Apr '15

07 Apr '15

I have Fedora 22 Server Beta TC4 (I realize TC6 is current0 installed, and just today realized the date+time is wrong by 20 hours. I don't know why it would be this wrong absent something to keep it accurate, however chrony is was not installed by default. It is installed by default with Fedora 21 Server. So? Is this inadvertent? I think something needs to keep the time correct. -- Chris Murphy

5 9

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

server April 2015