On Fri, 28 Feb 2014 13:55:34 -0500
Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
...snip...
What we need right now is a vote of the Server Working Group
membership whether we feel this document is in sufficiently good shape
to send to FESCo, who intends to use it to gauge estimates for the
Fedora 21 schedule. Please cast your votes as soon as possible (I
realize this may mean giving up an hour of your weekend to read the
document). If you have serious concerns, please raise them
immediately.
In general I am +1 to sending to fesco. ;)
Some minor nits:
* I think we should drop the note about armv8... it not only needs
hardware available, but promotion from secondary arch, etc. I'd love
to support it, but I don't think we should try and do so before it's
been fully brought up.
* I don't know that there are any tech limitations for /boot not on
lvm. But there's still an important case that needs it: encrypted /
* Did we want to list the media? ie, a network install iso and a non
network install iso and sizes?
Looks great otherwise, although I am sure we need to flesh it out some
and add things we havent thought of yet. ;)
Thanks for writing things up!
kevin