On 11/05/2013 11:35 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
If the cloud WG limits itself to the guest end of things shouldn't it
really be called "cloud guest WG"? cloud WG sounds like it deals with
*everything* concerning cloud deployments.
The hosting and running the cloud itself is an server role if not we
wind up having to split the server WG into thousand parts...
JBG